In 2001 the Enron scandal was broke and every aspect of the   means they did business was out in the open.   Stocks went up fast and the   roundabout board of directors was very happy with this success.   Eventually it was discovered  both sets of books were  creation kept by management and this lead to a  downward(prenominal) spiral for the company and it became aware that the company was using   haphazard accounting practice and were unethical in the way they did business.  Enrons highest level of management was  have-to doe with in the corruption.   Executives took part in altering their income statements in order to fool investors in  take Enron was doing great while running the firm into debt.   Enrons   control Arthur Andersen who was a consultant for the company had an interest in the company.   The  to a greater extent than money brought in the more business he saw.   That   right there was a conflict of interest.   All of that added to the controversy and could   impart been    pr all the sameted if more ethical practices were used.    on that point were no ethical or moral accounting practice followed.

   There was fraudulent auditing and shredding of  big documents.   The accounting firm knew exactly what was  dismissal on and never reported, but helps to cover it up.  Being the  restrainer for the company, I would  withstand acted professionally and ethically.   The first  tempo I would have  taken is make sure what I am looking at is correct, not knowing who all is involved possibly even go to the SEC and let them step in.   By not following ethical standards the company  upset billions of dollars along with  s   ome(prenominal) employees losing their jobs !   all so these top executives cover their failed ventures up.If you  fate to  enchant a full essay, order it on our website: 
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: 
cheap essay  
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.